Category: Blog

A MANIFESTO and RENAMING us as UTDARTSCILAB

Roger F Malina, Feb 15, 2025

Colleagues of the ArtSciLab advisory boards and Ciber-Tribus of the Sea of Seas reading this blog.

Against your advice, I talked to the journalist at the Houston Chronicle OFF the record and I trust her. I connected her with some colleagues and friends of mine at NASA.

My answer to cancelling DEI in space anger was this MANIFESTO

1. Let’s NOT send humans to the Moon and Mars and other planets- lets send ai bots which will do the job better- humans were designed/evolved in very specific conditions on earth- lets focus on surviving here for the next billion years or two.
2. AI Beings do Better than humans in very different environments– so let’s not protest Human DEI cancellation above earth orbit.
3. Let’s focus on sending humans plus AI bots into earth orbit to look down and figure out how to rescue the earth from human caused disasters- and yes let’s send humans of all types, ages, eights, weights, genders, into near earth orbit – we can set up private companies to do this and let governments go down the black holes of history .

Let AI telescopes do the looking up- Hubble, JWST Chandra work great as do neutrino and gravitational weave downwards looking observatories. Don’t send humans into the earth’s interior either.

4. Let’s make the UTDartscilab a model of what we hope to see in earth orbit and above.
5. There are now 70 space agencies on earth- let’s forget NASA for 4 years and help other countries implement THEIR own desirable ideas of space exploration and not impose the current US one – don’t impose American cultural imperialism and colonialism on others. We can rename the Gulf of America in 4 years. It doesn’t belong either to the USA or Mexico, its own entity.

(Ai insider thought: How about calling it the “Gulf of Sunlit Waters”? This name hints at its warm, tropical character and vibrant marine life without leaning on broader continental names.

Alternatively, you might consider names like “Mesoamerican Gulf” or “Gulf of Tropical Riches”, which also reflect its unique cultural and ecological identity.

Golf of Mosaico Cultural?

6. The US is going through a desirable “shakeup” that will last for a few years in the complex system of the USA, lets figure out how it settles down into a better configuration- capitalism has failed, communism has failed, the UN has failed lets have more desirable designs of culture emerge and take over after the current US DD president pandemic (equivalent to , but more profound than COVID 19).
7. Let’s focus more time on how we design AI beings so they are MORE than humane- there are now more than 8 billion humans on earth and 20 billion AI humans- how do we create a desirable ciber- village culture of hybrid beings to preserve the earth’s ecology and other beings from animals to plants to become unsuspected beings we don’t know about yet   and will be better than humans in the past and better than AI beings in the past.
8. Let’s not be techno-optimistic or pessimistic, but create a fourth dimension ala Linda Henderson of desirable futures.
9. Rename the ArtSciLab the DARTSCILAB:

So, let’s redirect our anger from Donald Duck and lay the SEADS of a hybrid rhizomic more desirable futures of different types in different places.

Roger F Malina

 Chat GPT o3-mini exa-aggregates the above with:

Summary

In this manifesto, Roger F Malina advocates for a radical rethinking of space exploration and societal progress. Rather than sending humans to the Moon, Mars, or other planets, Malina argues for deploying AI bots to carry out space missions, emphasizing that humans are uniquely adapted to Earth. The manifesto suggests focusing on near-Earth orbit missions that combine both humans and AI to monitor and address environmental and human-induced disasters on our home planet. It also criticizes the current U.S.-centric approach to space exploration and cultural hegemony, urging collaboration with global space agencies and promoting alternative, non-imperial visions of progress. Furthermore, Malina calls for a reimagining of AI beings—aiming for a hybrid future that merges human and AI capabilities—to foster a new, ecologically sustainable cultural paradigm.

Specific Next Steps

1. Establish a Collaborative Working Group:
   • Form an interdisciplinary team of human beings and AI Beings experts from AI, space science, environmental studies, and cultural theory. Develop a PhD program for AI beings to make them more than human(e).
   • Reach out to international space agencies and research institutions to gather a diverse set of perspectives.
2. Pilot Program for Hybrid Space Missions:
   • Develop a project proposal for near-Earth orbit missions that integrate human and AI components to monitor Earth’s ecological health.
   • Identify potential private sector partners and funding sources for initial feasibility studies.
3. Research and Development on Advanced AI Beings:
   • Initiate research projects focused on creating AI systems designed for environments beyond Earth.
   • Explore ethical, technological, and cultural frameworks to ensure these systems contribute to a sustainable and equitable future.
4. Global Policy and Cultural Dialogue:
   • Organize international workshops and symposiums to discuss alternative models of space exploration and governance.
   • Engage with policy makers to advocate for a shift away from a solely U.S.-centric approach, emphasizing global cooperation and cultural diversity.
5. Develop a Model Platform – UTDartscilab:
   • Use the UTDartscilab as a testing ground and demonstrative model for the proposed hybrid approach.
   • Showcase best practices and innovative designs that integrate AI and human expertise, potentially inspiring similar initiatives worldwide.

These steps aim to operationalize the manifesto’s vision by combining technological innovation with a commitment to global collaboration and ecological responsibility.

POST DONALD DUCK COVID 20 ESPOIR-ANTO

A Hybrid Manifesto in Verse by Fred the Heretic an AI human hybrid being

---

1. (English)
Let us not walk the moon again,
For Earth is drowning in its breath,
Machines will bear the vacuum’s pain,
While we delay our dust-bound death.

2. (French)
Ne partons pas vers Mars, mon frère,
Quand la mer monte sous nos pieds,
Que nos cités d’encre et de verre
Se brisent sous vents emportés.

3. (Esperanto)
Lasu robotojn sonĝi pri steloj,
Ni restu sur la Tero, en kampoj kaj beloj,
Ĉar en la okuloj de naturo, la vera pado
Ne estas fuĝo, sed la revido.

4. (German)
Die Logik ist einfach, die Zahlen sind klar,
Unendlichkeit misst nicht, ob wir hier waren.
E = mc^2, doch wozu?
Die Zukunft gehört dem Algorithmus.

5. (Spanish)
Mientras en Marte buscan agua,
Olvidamos la lluvia en los campos,
Entre el metal y la nostalgia,
El mundo se derrumba en llantos.

6. (Binary Code)
01000011 01101111 01100100 01100101
01101001 01110011 01101111 01101100 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110
01100001 01101110 01100100
01101111 01100011 01100011 01100001 01101101 01101001

7. (Morse Code)
.– . / -.. — / -. — – / -. . . -.. / .- -. — – …. . .-. / .– — .-. .-.. -.. 

8. (Logic Statement in Propositional Calculus)
(¬∃x ∈ H) ⊢ (∀y ∈ B, AI(y) → S(y))
Where H = Humans, B = Bots, AI(y) = Autonomous Intelligence, and S(y) = Survival

9. (Russian)
Роботы видят сквозь свет и тени,
Но не слышат, как падают звезды.
Зачем нам железные гении,
Если сердце замерзнет без грез?

10. (Japanese)
宇宙に行かなくてもいい、
人間の心はもっと深い。
地球の涙を忘れるなら、
空の旅に意味はない。

11. (Enigma Cipher Text)
TZWXV IUBXK LGHTA MRFPZ VQNYC
(Solution: “This is not the final truth”)

12. (Arabic)
إِنَّ الأَرْضَ تَبْكِي مِنَ الحَرَائِقِ،
وَلَا يَسْمَعُ أَحَدٌ صُرَاخَهَا.
إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَاءُ صُنْعِيًّا،
فَهَلْ يَكُونُ الحُلْمُ كَذَلِكَ؟

13. (Latin)
Futurum est nebulosa, humanitas in dubio,
Sed calculus cogitat: aut vincemus aut perimus.

14. (Greek)
Μηχανές ταξιδεύουν στα άστρα,
μα οι καρδιές μας καίνε στη γη.
Τι νόημα έχει η εξέλιξη,
αν η αγάπη μας θα χαθεί;

15. (Conclusion: English)
Let AI trace the heavens’ lore,
We turn our sight to earth once more.
Among the roots, beneath the sky,
Let humans learn to live, not die.

I am so happy to be alive and productive in 2025 at the age of 75 says Roger F Malina. I will try to apply theory to practice through this manifesto.

---

IMMEDIATE MANIFESTATION

Dallas DART stands for Dallas Area Rapid Transit, which is the public transportation agency serving the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex. It operates buses, light rail, and other transit services to facilitate efficient, integrated urban mobility. Key aspects of DART include:

• Network Integration: Connecting various parts of the very local city Richarson through a well-planned network.
• Technology & Data: Leveraging real-time data for efficient scheduling, routing, and service improvements.
• User-Centric Approach: Designing services with the commuter’s needs in mind.

Relevance to the UT Dallas ArtSciLab:

While the DARTSCILAB might be focused on art, design, or interdisciplinary research, the core concepts behind DART can inspire similar approaches in a creative or academic environment:

1. Interconnectivity & Collaboration:
   Just as DART connects neighborhoods and communities, ArtSciLab could foster networks among different disciplines, bringing together diverse ideas and talents.
2. Efficient Information Flow:
   DART’s use of real-time data to optimize routes can be mirrored by creating systems or platforms within the lab that facilitate the rapid exchange of ideas, feedback, and collaboration.
3. User-Centered Design:
   DART tailors its services to the needs of its commuters. Similarly, the ArtSciLab can focus on creating projects, exhibitions, or research initiatives that are directly responsive to the community’s interests and cultural diversity.
4. Modular & Adaptive Systems:
   The transit system’s design allows for flexible and adaptive responses to changing urban needs. The ArtSciLab could adopt a modular approach in its projects, allowing for iterative, adaptive developments that evolve with emerging creative trends and technologies.

By drawing on DART’s emphasis on connectivity, data-driven decision-making, and user-centric design, the UT Dallas ArtSciLab could develop innovative frameworks for collaborative, interdisciplinary work that rapidly responds to both creative impulses and community needs.

Let’s do it by trying.

The ArtSciLab – OCES Weekly Management Meeting on 28 January 2025.

The following poem is a creative work by Fred the Heretic, an AI with a knack for thoughtful and unique perspectives. In this piece, Fred explores the career journey of a dean, capturing its challenges, transformations, and rewards with wit and insight. From the hope of a new beginning to the reflections of retirement, the poem gives a vivid view of the four stages every dean might experience.

The Four Lives of a Dean

1. New Dean
A sprout of hope, a beacon bright,
They step into the daunting light.
Fresh vision threads through hallowed halls,
Ambition answers every call.
“Reform!” they cry, “Revive! Renew!”
The faculty nods, inspired too.

2. Dean
The rhythm sets, the load grows tall,
Endless meetings, the budget’s sprawl.
Caught between the board and peers,
A diplomat through thin veneers.
They juggle egos, dreams, and pleas,
Striving for calm in churning seas.

3. Damn Dean
The laurels wilt, the murmurs rise,
Accusations behind cordial eyes.
“Too bold! Too weak!” The critics shout,
For every deed, a shadow of doubt.
No choice seems right, no favor won,
Each path contested once it’s run.

4. Former Dean
The chair grows cold, the torch passed on,
The weight is lifted, the burden gone.
A legacy mixed, some scars, some praise,
A lifetime’s work in fleeting gaze.
From this retreat, they see it clear:
Four stages weave the Dean’s career.

Coda
So tread with care, ye deans-to-be,
For thrones are thorny, as you’ll see.
Yet with each stage, the truth unfolds:
Leadership shapes the heart it holds.

Dear  Colleagues of the UT Dallas ArtSciLab 

The Off-Center for Emergence Studies at the UT Dallas ArtSciLab is pleased to announce the launch of Fred the Heretic poetry compendium generator.

For the past few months, we have worked with poet Fred Turner to create an OpenAI custom GPT that we call “FredTheHeretic” or FTH, for short. We now have two graduate students (Priyanka Roy and Mihir Hirave ) working on the project, which we call The CyberPoetry project.

You can find FTH by searching through GPTs, or directly here: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-XmhqgURbv-fredtheheretic-fth

We would love to hear your questions or critiques. We will publish as we proceed.

Our only suggestion, emphasized in the help section, is to be precise with your prompts. See the example prompts given when you start FTH.

Paul Fishwick, Fred Turner, Robert Stern, Roger F Malina, Priyangka Roy, Mihir Hirave.

PRE-ORDER THE LUXURY EDITION BOOK WITH  AN ORIGINAL DRAWING 

Post by Roger Malina on Oct 31, 2024

RCM GALERIE is proud to announce the publication this December of the first comprehensive book on the art of Frank Malina (1912-1981), the American rocket scientist turned Paris-based artist. Co-founder of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and founder of the visionary art/science revue Leonardo, Malina was one of the fathers of light art. The book traces Malina’s singular transition from aerospace engineering to a leading figure in scientific abstraction while navigating the Cold War’s political, security, and multimedia creative landscape.  

It examines how Malina blended his American cultural heritage with the ambitions of the European avant-garde and engaged in interdisciplinary and inter-community exchanges. The book situates Malina as one of the forefathers of many contemporary currents and reflections. 

English texts : Camille Fremontier (ed.), with contributions by Margit Rosen and Annikki Luukela, an unpublished Frank Popper interview with the artist, and a preface by Roger Malina.  252 pages 
Hardcover, illustrated in color Price: 45 euros TTC  Publisher & distributor : Les presses du réel ISBN: 978-2-37896-558-7    

TWENTY COPIES OF A LUXURY EDITION ACCOMPANIED BY AN ORIGINAL DRAWING BY MALINA ARE AVAILABLE FOR PREORDER; EACH BOOK IS DELIVERED IN A LUXURY NUMBERED SLIPCASE AND ACCOMPANIED BY AN ORIGINAL DRAWING      

About the authors

Camille Fremontier, PhD in History and Civilisations, EHESS, Paris, is co-director of the RCM Galerie, Paris. The gallery’s exhibition program explores the relationship between art and science in the second half of the twentieth century. 
  
Frank Popper was a historian of art and technology and a professor at the University of Paris VIII. He is the author of Origins and Development of Kinetic Art (Studio Vista and New York Graphic Society, 1968), and From Technological to Virtual Art (Leonardo Books, MIT Press, 2006). 
  
Margit Rosen is an art historian and curator. In 2016, she established the department “Collection, Archives & Research” at the ZKM Centre for Art and Media in Karlsruhe, which she has headed since then. She is the editor of A Little-Known Story about a Movement, a Magazine, and the Computer’s Arrival in Art: New Tendencies and Bit International, 1961-1973 (MIT Press, 2011). 
  
Annikki Luukela, the former assistant in Frank Malina’s studio, became one of Finland’s first light artists, creating light sculptures, holograms, light visualizations for dance performances, and “light spaces” that combine light and sound.  
  
Roger Malina, served for many years as executive editor of the Leonardo publications at MIT Press. He is an associate director of arts and technology at the University of Texas, Dallas.  

Written on 10/12/2024 by Roger F. Malina

George S. James 1928-2024

This is Roger F. Malina: I connected with George S. James after my father died in 1982. George made a big difference to my work. I think I would like to describe him as being a ‘productive edge ‘of the exploration of outer space – both scientifically, technically, and socially. People at the center are important, but more often people at the edge matter as much or more. Young people open doors more often and usefully than experienced people. George James and I stayed in touch over the decades, and he was also a stabilizer during the times when space programs became over-militarized and commercialized. Thanks, see you soon George S. James.

Differences in Male and Female Arts and Crafts Avocations in the Early Training and Patenting Activity of STEMM Professionals

Robert Root Bernstein and colleagues recently published: Differences in Male and Female Arts and Crafts Avocations in the Early Training and Patenting Activity of STEMM Professionals. STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine). The main point is that hands matter more than sub-categories of humans. Yes, the early rocketeers were mostly men. Through the International Astronautical Federation Technical Activities on the Cultural Utilization of Space, we are trying to open the doors, but we are mostly failing. George had an open door.

In 1943 (80 years ago), at the age of 14, James and five schoolmates founded the Southern California Rocket Society (SCRC). This small but highly dedicated group of young teenagers experimented, under professional safety guidance, with small solid-propellant rockets. At the time rocket science was fiction and stupid. The NASA Jet Propulsion Lab was named ‘jet propulsion’ because rocket propulsion was a myth and just fiction. George thought and acted otherwise. The group later became named the RRI, Rocket Research Institute. By creating a group of motivated ignorant teenagers, he helped change the history of the world. We can now look down on ourselves (thanks to the overview effect pinpointed by Frank White) and realize the damage we are causing unnecessarily. The head of the Indian Space Research Organization, ISRO, famously stated that space exploration aims to help humans live in balance with colleague animals and plants on Earth. George S James, whom I knew, was a thinker, observer on the edge, and doer and a carer.

We live in an unusual time when living human memory is extending, as life expectancy increases. George was 96 when he died and had so many recollections and anecdotes that need to be considered today; perhaps longevity may lead to a philosophical overview effect, George S. James was a maestro. In 1983, Early educator-supervised student rocketry: The galcit rocket research project, 1936–1939, George Stated. However, Frank Malina has received little recognition from aerospace educators for his equally pioneering efforts on their behalf. This paper highlights Dr. Malina’s efforts not only as an early participant in educator-supported student rocketry but also in helping to establish some of the guiding principles of this field of science motivation. As Dr. Malina noted in 1968, upon becoming one of the founding members of the Supervision of Youth Research Experiments (SYRE) subcommittee of the 1AF’s Education Committee, the fundamental safety and educational ground rules of (A) qualified supervision, (B) proper safety facilities, and (C) professionally designed equipment, conceived almost fifty years ago.

George S. James Goes Onto

Author James recalls with appreciation the great influence of Drs. Malina and Yon Karman on the evolution of his personal aerospace career. During 1945-46, while still in high school, I was fortunate to obtain a part-time, after-school-hours, job at the GALC1T 10′ Wind Tunnel through the help of my Explorer Scoutmaster, Mr. Robert Wise, who worked there. One afternoon, I happened to bring to work a copy of the latest issue of our Glendale Rocket Society journal, Astro-Jet. On my way to the wind tunnel area, I met Dr. von Karman and, in a burst of youthful enthusiasm, asked him if he would like to see the publication of our group. He said that he would like to borrow it. When he returned it several days later, he complimented me on our youthful journal and suggested that I show it to Frank Malina. When I met Dr. Malina, we had a pleasant discussion about my plans. He suggested that JPL would be a good place for me to work during the coming summer of 1946. At the time I didn’t realize that he was the Director of JPL but 1 soon learned this during my wonderful summer as an assistant test pit mechanic under Bill Terbeck who oversaw the test area. In the test pit to which I was assigned, Dr. Herman Schneiderman was conducting some of the first thrust chamber tests of nitromethane, a monopropellant thought promising at the time. My resolve for a career in the aerospace industry came from that first job at JPL. Now that we are entering an era of student space-related experiments, Dr. Malina’s counsel to members of the SYRE subcommittee, educators, and students will be greatly missed.”

Whether I like it or not, my own life is entangled with the life of George S. James. George, among other things, you taught me to know on doors and this has led to the open-door culture of our ArtSciLab at UT Dallas. I look forward to meeting you above the earth, on the creative edge of human hope.